Aneeta Mishra
Trial-focused preparation across workers’ compensation, immigration, selected employment disputes, and related litigation.
Meet AneetaCalifornia trial counsel
When work, status, livelihood, or a hard-earned business is at stake, Mission X Trial Lawyers brings the discipline of trial preparation to every decision—from the first record review through hearing, negotiation, and trial.
Trial strength, before trial
We identify the controlling facts, protect deadlines, test the record, and prepare for the forum that can change the outcome. That vigilance gives clients clarity when pressure is high and the next move matters.
Meet the trial team
Aneeta Mishra and Timothy Chan protect client interests through disciplined factual development, candid advice, and preparation built for the moment a case is tested.
Trial-focused preparation across workers’ compensation, immigration, selected employment disputes, and related litigation.
Meet Aneeta
Careful factual development and disciplined preparation for administrative proceedings, hearings, negotiation, and trial.
Meet TimothyWhere we step in
Different forums demand different rules. Our common discipline is to organize the record, protect the deadline, and prepare every matter for the point where facts and law are tested.

Representation in denied claims, medical treatment and evaluation disputes, disability, settlement, and WCAB proceedings.
Explore workers’ compensation
Focused review of discrimination, retaliation, harassment, wage, and related employment disputes under California law.
Explore employment work
Representation in removal proceedings, detention matters, appeals, and related federal litigation, with attention to the forum and deadline.
Explore immigration work
Bookkeeping and preparation support alongside attorney-led counsel for disputes, planning, and legally consequential tax matters.
Explore tax servicesHow the work moves
Moving fast matters only after the problem is understood. We make the next step deliberate, explainable, and ready for scrutiny.
We identify the operative facts, deadlines, decision makers, and immediate risks—not just the label attached to the matter.
Documents, medical evidence, testimony, financial records, and procedural history are organized around what must be proved.
Negotiation, hearing, agency review, or trial—the strategy is built for the forum where the client’s interests will be tested.
Current analysis
Recent decisions translated into the procedural and practical questions clients and counsel need to see early.

Why adequate information and fair procedures matter before a settlement becomes enforceable.
Read analysis
The state high court addresses federal preemption and limited contract-based excuses.
Read analysis
Riley clarifies finality and the character of the petition-for-review deadline.
Read analysis
Commissioner v. Zuch defines the jurisdictional consequence when the IRS stops pursuing the levy under review.
Read analysis
A consequential matter deserves a prepared first conversation
Tell us what happened, what deadline is approaching, and what is at stake. An inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship or preserve a filing deadline.